Death Of a Pirate?

April 21, 2009 at 2:48 am 1 comment

First off let me clarify that this post is going to be a lot more serious than my usual ramblings, It concerns the (In) Famous Pirate bay trial :

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8003799.stm

The gist of which is that a Swedish Court has held that The pirate bay by listing torrent files on its servers has violated copyright law. Here are my reasons why the Honourable Justices had their heads up their asses:

  • The pirate Bay does not host any copyrighted material on its servers
  • What it does host are trackers that point to files
  • esssentially it functions as a search engine (much like google) enabling the downloading of files

It was the opinion of the court that merely enabling the download of copyrighted material also violated copyright law, lets extend this logical into the non electronic realm.

  1. I buy a lamp from kmart
  2. I use the lamp to kill someone
  3. Kmart sold the lamp to me thereby enabling the murder
  4. Kmart is guilty of murder

OR

  1.  I buy a car from BMW
  2. In an accident i kill someone
  3. BMW sold me the car hence they are liable for all damages

In fact why is youtube not being sued for violating copyrights? (perhaps Recording execs are fearful of being bombarded by mails containing the words “LOL ur a fag” ) what about google, I’m sure if i type in “download movies free” i should get atleast a million hits ( I checked, its 33,000,000) why not sue them? 

To me, the reason this kind of a verdict is arrived at is because the people in power are a bunch of old farts who don’t seem to understand the rules in a digital world, not paying for copyrighted material is illegal, but like i mentioned in the start of this post, Pirate Bay did not violate copyright material because of  the fundamental reason “They did not violate Swedish law”, in conclusion :It is the opinion of this blogger that the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) can suck my balls

EDIT: As the bongo has pointed out in the comments, yes TPB has appealed this decision and the court case seems like it would drag out for a few more years, but the fact remains the decision by the courts was a classic case of head up one’s ass, which is what i chose to write about

Entry filed under: Digital Musings. Tags: , , , , .

Transporter 2: A Random Summary Its all in the family

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. beingbongo  |  April 21, 2009 at 9:05 am

    This is exactly what Pirate Bay founder Peter Sunde tweeted :

    “Stay calm – Nothing will happen to TPB, us personally or file sharing what so ever. This is just a theater for the media.”

    I always knew that people who can afford a Bugatti just has to be smart and Sunde proves that.Even though he faces a Jail term it might not be anytime soon because they have gone on record that they have filed an appeal. This will take years to resolve and meanwhile the TPB team will buy some more Bugattis and belittle the allegations because in this post RIAA era … there might not be any suing after all in a year or so…..

    In other news Oracle buys SUN

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Add to Technorati Favorites

Archives

April 2009
M T W T F S S
« Mar   Jul »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: